![crowdstrike dnc server crowdstrike dnc server](https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Crowdstrike-ukraine-russia-impeachment-trump-clinton-hillary-putin-zelensky-conspiracy-social.jpg)
They are now trying to sell a war against Iran, and will ilkely use many of the same techniques and tactics to do so. We learned very importantly during the Iraq war that we should simply not trust their claims without hard evidence.
![crowdstrike dnc server crowdstrike dnc server](https://assets.extrahop.com/images/bundles/extrahop/crowdstrike-network-containment.png)
Yes, you can trust the US IC that the attack was a state actor quality, Russian sponsored triumph, but these are the same experts who helped sell the Iraq war. The report appears to have been copied and pasted from previous releases, and contained virtually no useful information. When the US IC released its report, the report referred to the Crowdstrike findings, but also excluded evidence.
Crowdstrike dnc server series#
Why didn’t they take the server? Where is the server, I want to know, and what is the server saying?”).The US IC and DHS clearly have strategic reasons for wanting to crack down on Russia, as evidenced by the strong level of centrist support for doing so.Ĭrowdstrike decided to make a series of announcements expressing confidence that there had been Russian state sponsored attacks on the DNC server, and did not offer any evidence of it. He even brought it up standing next to Vladimir Putin at the now infamous 2018 Helsinki meeting, where Trump refused to acknowledge Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election (“You have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server. Key background: Trump has frequently raised questions about the “missing DNC server” and why the FBI never got to look at it. As we’ve stated before, we stand by our findings and conclusions that have been fully supported by the US Intelligence community.”Ĭrucial quote: “The server, they say Ukraine has it,” Trump said on the phone call with Zelensky, according to records of the exchange. In a statement to Forbes, a spokesperson CrowdStrike stated: “With regards to our investigation of the DNC hack in 2016, we provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI.Breitbart and the Daily Caller also claim Alperovitch has anti-Russia leanings, solely because he’s a nonresident senior fellow of the Cyber Statecraft Initiative at the Atlantic Council, which the outlets claim takes a hawkish stance against Russia and is funded by left-wing billionaire George Soros.That belief may stem from a statement by President Trump in a 2017 interview with the Associated Press, in which he questioned why the FBI didn’t look at the DNC server, that CrowdStrike is owned by “a very rich Ukrainian.” Alperovitch is actually a Russian-born American citizen.The supposed evidence of Russia’s innocence relies on the belief that a DNC server has been hidden in Ukraine, possibly by CrowdStrike’s cofounder Dmitri Alperovitch.According to the theory, which has been prominent on right-wing blogs and news websites and repeated by Trump and former campaign consultant Roger Stone, Democrats and CrowdStrike concocted evidence to frame Russia for the hack in order to discredit Trump’s win in 2016.The company didn’t give the DNC’s physical server to the FBI, which has been seized on by conspiracy theorists as evidence of a cover up. Silicon Valley-based CrowdStrike was hired in 2016 by the DNC to investigate the origins of the hack.